{"issued_at":"2026-09-17T00:00:00Z","version":"1.0","nature":"partial methodology disclosure · non-exhaustive · construction details are trade-secret","host":"SSRN · Social Science Research Network (preprint / working-paper server)","papers":[{"short_name":"DRCET-1","full_title":"Deterministic Risk-Compute Equivalence Test — A Sampling-Resolution-Bounded Equivalence Benchmark for Institutional Risk-Compute Engines","ssrn_abstract_id":"6893318","url":"https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6893318","thematic_anchor":"equivalence benchmark for institutional risk-compute engines · new benchmark class · not STAC-like","closes_evidence_gap":"third-party equivalence benchmark for deterministic risk-compute kernels — a benchmark class STAC / A2 / A3 / M3 does not cover because STAC methodologies are Monte-Carlo-based and cannot express deterministic-kernel equivalence within a sampling-resolution bound","anchors_in_codebase":["phase480_kernel_benchmark","phase78_determinism_property_test","phase366_kernel_properties_test","docs/MATH_INVARIANTS.md (Phase 371)","Wave 2 · T1 · byte-determinism × 13 doctrine cases","Wave 4 · G1-G5 · hash-chained gov ledger tamper-verify"]},{"short_name":"Cross-Institution Validation","full_title":"Validating a Shared Deterministic Risk Kernel Across Two Peer Institutional Control Planes — Backtest Evidence from Rolling-Window Validation and Cross-Product Implications for Risk-Decision and Company-Workflow Applications","ssrn_abstract_id":"6869978","url":"https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6869978","thematic_anchor":"rolling-window backtest across two peer institutional control planes","closes_evidence_gap":"independent replication on customer institutional hardware (two peer institutional control planes)","anchors_in_codebase":["phase79 doctrine identity · kokon-kernel/1.11.0-2026.05.15 semver pin","phase89_sovereign_manifest","Wave 4 · G1-G5 · hash-chained gov ledger","phase480 · Brev Launchable · docs/artifacts/kernel-benchmark"]},{"short_name":"Low-Latency Stress · Operator-Splitting","full_title":"Low-Latency Stress Testing for AI-Integrated Macro-Financial Risk — An Operator-Splitting Framework with Adaptive Error Calibration and Ontological Safety Controls","ssrn_abstract_id":"6749503","url":"https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6749503","thematic_anchor":"operator-splitting framework with adaptive error calibration + ontological safety","closes_evidence_gap":"published methodology paper describing the mathematical framework of the kernel","anchors_in_codebase":["phase121_black_swan · 4 canonical scenarios + worst-tail","phase68_loss_detector · PCA + EVT + condition-keyed stress","phase52_risk_core · MC + closed-form q_{0.999}","phase484_refusal_predicates · ontological safety controls","docs/MATH_INVARIANTS.md (Phase 371)"]},{"short_name":"Coupled Physical-Financial Dynamics","full_title":"Adaptive Stress Testing via Operator Splitting — A Multi-Operator Framework for Coupled Physical-Financial Risk Dynamics","ssrn_abstract_id":"6749279","url":"https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6749279","thematic_anchor":"multi-operator framework for coupled physical-financial risk","closes_evidence_gap":"public methodology for how physical + financial risk operators compose under shared safety controls","anchors_in_codebase":["phase60_company_diagnostic_packet · TOPOLOGY + MATH + RISK bundle","phase68_loss_detector · condition-keyed stress","phase148_openclaw_agent_assessment · physical-condition operators","phase128_math_bifurcation · κ + VIF diagnostic (coupled-system phase transitions)"]}],"corpus_doc_url":"docs/PUBLISHED_METHODOLOGY.md","boundary":"partial disclosure · not full construction · not peer-reviewed journal · not regulator endorsement · not substitute for external audit · not decision-grade authorization · not sibling-module claims","non_claims":["not full construction disclosure — kernel implementation stays under trade-secret protection","not a peer-reviewed journal publication — SSRN is a preprint / working-paper server","not a regulator endorsement — no Fed / OCC / ECB / MAS formal endorsement claimed","not a substitute for external audit — SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / PCAOB still require accredited body","not decision-grade authorization — forensic.v1 stays FABRIC_REGISTERED_REVIEW_ONLY","not sibling-module claims — Risk Analyzer / GRI / Investment / Digital Assets are separately owned","DRCET-1 is NOT a STAC-like benchmark — STAC / A2 / A3 / M3 are Monte-Carlo-based benchmarks structurally unable to express deterministic-kernel equivalence; DRCET-1 defines a new benchmark class filling a category STAC does not cover"],"framing_corrections":[{"mis_framing":"DRCET-1 is a STAC benchmark","reality":"STAC benchmarks (A2, A3, M3) are Monte-Carlo-based and time an MC run. DRCET-1 tests deterministic-kernel equivalence under a bounded sampling-resolution error envelope — a category STAC does not publish. Framing DRCET-1 as 'STAC-like' misrepresents both the paper and the benchmark class it defines."},{"mis_framing":"KOKON is missing a STAC listing","reality":"STAC does not publish a deterministic-kernel equivalence benchmark. Saying 'KOKON is missing a STAC listing' asks for a benchmark class that does not exist in STAC's catalogue. The correct posture is: STAC's Monte-Carlo-only methodology is structurally inadequate for deterministic risk-compute engines; DRCET-1 fills the gap."}]}